QLS Proctor – FUNERAL & ESTATE ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES: Foster v Takai [2016] QDC 329, delivered ex tempore on 01.12.2016

FUNERAL & ESTATE ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES: Foster v Takai [2016] QDC 329, delivered ex tempore on 01.12.2016

Less so these days, but I still encounter clients with a strange view as to who is responsible for estate administration expenses.  Some have the view that the solicitor’s fees and all other estate administration expenses are paid by the estate.  When faced with that, I very gently explain, it is the person who incurs the expense, who is responsible. However, they may claim those expenses from the estate.  It is a fine distinction but a necessary one. It focuses the client’s attention on what constitutes a reasonable estate administration expense.  Such issues were recently canvassed in Foster v Takai.

The matter addressed a claim for wrongful distribution of trust property.  The Administrator’s defence involved her claiming parts of the estate distribution were properly incurred as she was entitled to claim estate administration expenses.  Some of those expenses included: airfares, accommodation and transport for relatives to attend the funeral, contributions to the deceased’s sibling, nieces and nephews, costs of well-being (health issues due to stress) costs of gravesite maintenance, hardship costs etc. The full claim was $223,750.00. After various concessions and mathematical recalculations, the amount was reduced by $38,886.04, which included funeral expenses allowed at $20,500. In respect of Funeral expenses his Honour Morzone J affirmed at [19]-[24] the principles applied to claims for funeral expenses in Qld.

Ultimately the court found the administrator had made wrongful distributions and made orders as to the amount plus interest.

To download this in PDF, click here!

DISCLAIMER:
1. The information on this blogpost is of a general nature, not intended to be specific professional advice.
2. Please seek the opinion of a professional to advise you of your situation.
3. The author’s opinions are his/her own and do not represent the views of any other person, firm or entity.
4. The author is not responsible for the accuracy or appropriateness of comments or articles, including guest authors/editorial contributions.
5. Any comments, letters, and other submissions are moderated and may be edited or withheld at the sole discretion of the author.